![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/8286e071-7449-4413-a084-1eb5242e2cf4.png)
What does ss -tlnp
return? Does the process listen on any ports?
What does ss -tlnp
return? Does the process listen on any ports?
That should only affect ports below 1024.
I made it to about episode 5 with Discovery (the one with the security officer getting mauled because she walked into that cage with the wild animal unarmed) by actively giving it more chances than it deserved, not sure how you managed to watch a whole two seasons of it.
Your two bind addresses might be in conflict with each other since [::]:5234
includes binding to the first one.
You want https://tabby.tabbyml.com/ instead of tabby.ml
On the other hand playing any game competitively online is basically only possible if you have lots of time since you just can’t compete significantly otherwise.
Especially when all the workarounds to make it barely usable from Mastodon spill over into Lemmy in the form of bots posting weird hashtags or headlines being full of hashtags,…
I am certainly less invested in huge budget games than ever. Maybe developers need to consider the kind of games they are making in a bit more detail than just by platform.
Talking about PRs being broken and then bringing up email, just about the most broken technology still in wide-spread use, is sort of ironic.
Yeah, the whole commenting won’t work if the server where the repo is hosted fails or the server where the person has an account. There is no redundancy.
I could be up and running in like 10 minutes to install Forgejo or Gitea
You could maybe do that but only because you already know how unlike most developers and you completely dismiss any active maintenance like updates, moderation, debugging performance issues, resizing storage,…
The term “single point of failure” means that only that point has to fail for the entire system to become unusable. You can easily have more than one of those in a system though.
Forgefed seems to be ActivityPub based which, judging by Lemmy, doesn’t solve the redundancy issue at all, it just allows you to interact with the content hosted in a single place from your own single place, giving you two single points of failure and two points where you can be tracked instead of one. This is not really the same kind of distributed as git repositories.
Can you name an open platform that actually does distribute PRs and issues? I know there were a few that tried but I mean one that actually succeeded and is usable by people who just want to report a bug?
Also, your issues and pull requests are much more likely to be lost in your self-hosted one project instance than on GitHub if anything happens to you.
I can understand the argument against GitHub in two contexts, one is when people build features into their software that assume GitHub, e.g. when a programming language assumes it can just prepend github.com/ to your repo to find it and the other is the argument that losing GitHub would be a huge blow because so many projects are there and only there so a lot of things would have to be done at once if that ever happened.
Federation doesn’t really solve the issue that self-hosting takes effort away from working on the actual project.
Haven’t used it myself but you could give https://rustdesk.com/ a try.
Not only that but that is also true for all the other management positions in between CEO and the team and project managers down at the level where the actual work is done. They are all too focused on their on personal gain and career advancement.
All those same marketing techniques are also employed with actual elections.
My point was that “voting with your wallet” works, it is not a flaw in the method, it is a flaw in the low number of people employing it that it achieves so little. It is inherently no worse than all the other things you could do that you can’t convince anyone else to join you in when protesting company’s behavior. In fact I would go so far as to say that convincing yourself that you did something and then still buying their product is actually just giving in to those very same dark patterns you mention.
IPv6 binds on wildcard addresses include binding to the IPv4 addresses.