• 4 Posts
  • 252 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 21st, 2023

help-circle
  • I would buy a feature phone today, preferably something eink, if it was painless to switch my SIM between it and my smart phone. Having to take the SIM out of one, put it in the other, then turn on the phone is not painless and they do not design the little draws to support thousands of open/closes against the contacts to read the SIM.

    There are times I want the smart phone to have the SIM because I will want or need the extra functionality and if you just make the feature phone do everything then its just morphed into a smart phone with extra steps. I want the feature phone to be basic as I can get away with.

    That said, I really want google wallet or similar that I can share between the two phones for my passes and tickets, audio streaming support, and maps. Something like a Hisense A9 would fit the bill but the temptation to add more apps than the basics would be too great, plus I still need a way to switch SIMs between the phones.

    I cannot replace my smart phone, rather than supplement, with any feature phone because I use it for such a wide range of things. I can ssh from it to my home devices, I can manage my bank accounts, it tracks my health, it provides video and audio streaming on and offline, I can read and write documents/spreadsheets, plus anything you can do via a web browser.





  • What this chart is missing is the impact of the quality of the screen and the source material being played on it.

    A shit screen is a shit screen, just like a badly filmed TV show from the 80s will look like crap on anything other than an old CRT.

    People buying a 4k screen from Wallmart for $200 then wondering why they cant tell its any better than their old 1080p screen.

    The problem with pushing up resolution is the cost to get a good set right now is so much its a niche within a niche of people who actually want it. Even a good 4k set with proper HDR support and big enough to make a different is expensive. Even when 8k moves away from early adopter markups its still going to be expensive, especially when compared to the tat you can by at the supermarket.





  • I broadly agree but the other parts of that cost model is the number of people looking to rent, amount of properties to rent, and the minimum cost of being able to offer them to rent.

    If your costs go up, such as interest rate rises, increased legislation, or additional taxation then those on the margins have only two choices, put up prices or sell up. I saw it with the recent interest rate rises, properties sold at a discount with sitting tenants as the land lord could no longer afford the property.

    What the rents are offered is dictated by what the majority for that property price point can afford. Increase rent beyond whats affordable and you will decrease the supply of renters.

    Less renters, less properties getting rented, and if you are a marginal land lord then last thing you want is the property empty for any period of time so you have to sell, further reducing supply.

    Once you start cutting out the bottom of the affordability end of that property type rents as an average can go up as the people left can afford to spend more on rent and there are less properties to rent reducing supply.

    This is whats been happening with less and less young people even renting now, the bottom gets priced out.



  • I think so many small landlords using b2l are so heavily leveraged thry have no choice but to pass it on, then that dictates the price as almost everyone else just follows the market in high demand areas.

    I used to feel the same way around rents when they fairer but the market has gotten out of control, particularly in heavy holiday rental areas i think fuck that. As its resulted in renting becoming out of step with costs to buy in some areas.

    I agree that all profit should be taxed but its a massive own goal with kipper fave waiting in the wings to take advantage. Renters seeing price rises won’t blame landlords directly for this.







  • With CDs they were negatively impacted by the loudness war as it became much more widespread. Having to hunt around for the right recording, often the earlier ones, can be expensive. Normalisation of the recordings by streaming companies is just an awful idea as it doesn’t fix the bad parts of the mix just turns everything down.

    I prefer SACDs to CDs, mostly because they tended to be mastered and mixed better than the CDs of the past two decades. The surround audio mixes are mostly just gimmicky, although they are a good fit for some records, but they almost always had a two channel mix that you could pick instead. The higher frequency range is mostly pointless.