You’d be at the whim of every social media fad. Musk and Bezos would set the agenda even more than today.

Hard disagree.

Trump addressed the cost of living in his campaign. Some people voted for him because he said he’d do something about it.

He’ll make the problem worse, but he won votes because he talked about it.

Me with company emails on outlook: “It’s down? Didn’t notice.”

…paid to browse the web.

Shame the web doesn’t really exist anymore.

Fair. :-)

I never thought handing them over to Mauritius was the right thing. Using them as a naval base is also messed up but that wasn’t going anywhere.

So I see this a positive thing, but the optics for Starmer couldn’t be worse. It makes him look like Trumps lapdog.

…because you were looking at the shadow.

Personally I’d like better representation.

The problem with direct democracy is that you can’t expect everyone to be knowledgeable on every topic whilst they go on living their normal life. A full time representative can spend time researching, or having advisors research. In theory they could be better informed than the public.

They’re not, but in theory they could be.

No. When looking at a shadow of a bird flying, you can’t understand how the bird is really moving.

In this case, the “centre-left” isn’t engaging on the issues that people face day to day. The right parties engage with them, but give fascist solutions. The fact that the problem is acknowledged attracts some people. Others it pushes to not vote. It looks like the population is moving right, but it actually that the electorate isn’t representable by the options available.

Well I don’t think they’re growing. Depending on the sector all the AI data scanning is a concern for a number of companies. I’ve seen a lot of European discussions about getting away from US cloud services too.

If they lose all the money they have pumped into AI, then they will be relying on Windows and Office.

Good for them that both of those are currently doing fine.

It’s a big matrix multiplier that is tailored for machine learning model evaluation (not training). Often they are low precision as that’s all you need for model evaluation (or “inference”).

Think of it as a much less useful GPU because it won’t do graphics.

I don’t find the switch that odd. The Conservatives and Labour have shown that they are out of touch with the problems people are facing day to day.

Reform gain support by paying lip service to those issues. They then point the finger in the wrong direction as to the cause, using it as a way to drive they’re real agenda.

The greens are also addressing the problems people face, but proposing radical solutions from the other end of the spectrum.

So if you’re an ex-reform voter could go to a party that’s telling you your problems don’t exist. You go to the party that proposes a different solution.

Need to solve the discover-ability of it though. Peertube is only useful if you know what you’re going there for.

Zero sounds a bit high.

Please, take on all the people that caused the Tory implosion in 2024. Voters haven’t forgotten the clusterfuck.

New party is same as the old party

Agreed, but it should just mean that one piece of evidence is excluded. Not the every pro-Israel mouthpiece gets to go "See a clear case of AnTiSeMiTiSm. Those hooligans fart roses. There’s no reason to ban them. "

At least the trend of putting “AI” in product names should stop.

Even then, which is much better than the cloud models, most people seem to be as Dell said. They are not buying AI.

Oh no!

Anyway…