Sure buddy.
Sure buddy.
You should have said “sure buddy” and ignored them.
It’s a dungeon management game from '97. You are an evil Keeper and control a dungeon where you need to build rooms and train your creatures to attack (or defend from) the good guys.
Nowadays people play KeeperFX which is the opensource remake.
He is being charged with W R O N G T H I N K.
15 years ago I did a school paper on the pros of psychoactive drugs, including a presentation in front of my class.
Nowadays I’d have to make a public YouTube video to stop the hate I’d receive. Or at least get kicked out of class.
Nobody really cared about stuff that wasn’t affecting them.
God you’re evil.
How can I do it?
Only a few of them. Many just work.
I mean for the big software boys to actually start caring about it.
This feels like a scam just like those Elon Musk crypto scams you see everywhere.
It’s pretty sad how not having the money for it makes it unbearable, while all of them don’t need to experience it, disconnecting them from their practices.
They also take a cut from content purchases and tips to content creators.
The article implies nobody even knew it already had this functionality. I’m sure the customers weren’t told either.
They kept trying to ruin my experience so I’ve switched to Invidious and Odysee.
Invidious only for the content creators that don’t crosspost to Odysee yet.
Every video ad needs to have the video uploaded to YouTube afaik. So it’s possible to find it, although I’m not sure if it also works for private videos.
Not enough training data on Kamala. But sure try and make it racist.
I am the admin of a website where we have a place where our users can post custom content and rate the content of others.
We have discussed how it works and should work many times and came to the conclusion that we’d never want it to be public. Any report of abuse will be checked by the website owner directly in the database and even admins don’t have full access. Everybody tries to stay as far away from the personal ratings as possible.
We also noticed that it would be a lot more fragile when there are not many voters. A whole group that is negative about something wouldn’t get as much harassment as a single person having a unique opinion.
On our website we have a comment section that isn’t anonymous, and we even noticed that people often don’t post something negative when it would be obvious that they are the only one who has voted/rated something. (“Negative” is almost always constructive in our case)
These are just a few things that I think add to this discussion.
Making a browser addon/extension wouldn’t be too hard if you can get the data somewhere. And then it’s just a click of a button to get the functionality.
I mean, the owner and other admins of the instance should stop any rogue admins right?
I really dislike that guy. I was interested in his website but lost interest because of him. I already forgot why I started disliking him. But this just adds to that.