![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/41e39366-cb91-4d4a-bc07-a47621cb7d5f.jpeg)
There’s a big distinction between being republican and capital-R Republican, and between being pro-democracy and a capital-D Democrat
There’s a big distinction between being republican and capital-R Republican, and between being pro-democracy and a capital-D Democrat
You had me for a moment there
Yeah I guess waydroid is probably the way to go for TFT on Linux
Twice. I did it twice.
Why not just use type c headphones?
The 3.5mm thing has always baffled me, it feels like complaining your pc doesn’t have a VGA port, except the thing you connect costs like a fiver
As people have said, it’s actually perfectly legal in the US, horrifyingly.
But the UK has very strict data protection laws which we inherited from when we were in the EU, and medical data is explicitly considered sensitive. If they actually did sell medical information, they’re in deep shit, legally.
How is turning it off an improvement over lockdown? I was under the impression that the security impact is basically the same
Two important persons from US history, a deity and a little penguin
It’s just a shitpost, not a declaration that Trump was some great American historical figure, chill
I’m hoping that the sheer cost of executing that sort of war will continue to be a prohibiting factor like it is today
Upvoted exclusively for that 10/10 pun
I broadly agree, but that’s not what this is, right?
This is a demonstration of using AI to execute combat against an explicitly selected target.
So it still needs the human to pull the trigger, just the trigger does some sick plane stunts rather than just firing a bullet in a straight line.
You seem to be confusing a social responsibility to vote for a viable candidate (which this thread is referring to) with advocating for a compulsory two party system (which is a terrible idea)
The test team, standing half inside and half outside the eclipse: uncannyuncanny picpic
You’ll love crack houses!
The panopticon is… a chatbot that suggests you get help if you search for CSAM? Those bastards! /s
Canada is a magical place
Does it behave the same if you refer to it as “the war in Gaza”/“Israel-Palestine conflict” or similar?
I wouldn’t be surprised if it trips up on making the inference from Oct 7th to the (implicit) war.
Edit: I tested it out, and it’s not that - formatting the question the same for Russia-Ukraine and Israel-Palestine respectively does still yield those results. Horrifying.
Oh no, not them removing a vague vibe in place of an explicit policy on transphobia.
What an absurd reason to defederate a server
“no, I won’t provide a source for my claim, because my source is not good/non-existent”
FTFY
provide the reason you don’t like those studies
They didn’t say they don’t “like” the studies though, in fact they actively said they were interested in seeing them. What’s the point of asking someone to explain why they don’t like something that they haven’t even seen yet. Sure they could go find some random related studies and then critique those but that seems pretty pointless.
Edit: since I’m whining about lack of sources, I should probably give some myself
Here’s a paper investigating the correlation (or more specifically, lack of correlation) between social media usage and mental health outcomes for young adults:
Well except for the fact that the salary option is:
If they would be able to get even a slightly worse salaried job instead of being an MP, then the financial motive is - in contrast to your claim - actually in favour of him losing