• Zexks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    That’s basically like saying g all mmo’s should illegal. Or that it is illegal to go out of business and close up shop without giving away all your code.

    • Blueberrydreamer@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      That’s pretty much exactly what I’m saying. If you offer software that requires outside servers to run, you should be legally obligated to release the code used to run the servers if you discontinue supporting that software. That doesn’t make mmo’s any different, just a minor change to how they handle end of life.

      • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        If you don’t like how a company handles their end of life then don’t buy from them. Trying to make it illegal is unnecessary as companies are already facing negative consequences for making poor EOL choices. I don’t like forcing developers to create in a specific way, I’d rather they have freedom to choose.

        • Adalast@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          What does releasing the code have to do with development decisions? I am a developer and this sentiment really confused me, so please elucidate.

          • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            They should be able to decide whether to open source or not. If people don’t like their decision they shouldnt buy their game.

            • Adalast@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              17 hours ago

              At what point in the purchase cycle is it known that they won’t? Because the right reserved in a EULA is not a guarantee of occurrence, so how does one make a decision when or when not to purchase?

              Also, when single player games are being forced to be always online and are being affected, there is a real problem. If there is no valid tangible benefit to the player for a game to be online, and require the online component to play the game, it should be illegal.

              • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 hours ago

                Well, I knew the crew would be decommissioned and dissapear from day one. I’m not sure why people expected it to live forever. I understand people want to change things to be different, but the norm before was that online games are sunset. Its happened over and over.

                And you would base your decision on prior actions of the company. Dont buy ubisoft until they prove they have fixed this problem. You already shouldnt be playing online games hosted by shitty companies, exactly for this reason. Most companies actually don’t fuck their fan base over, and so its not an issue.