weirdbeardgame@lemmy.world to Games@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-223 天前What games are just objective masterpieces?message-squaremessage-square290linkfedilinkarrow-up1192arrow-down115
arrow-up1177arrow-down1message-squareWhat games are just objective masterpieces?weirdbeardgame@lemmy.world to Games@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-223 天前message-square290linkfedilink
minus-squareoni ᓚᘏᗢ@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·23 天前Are you saying that Portal 2 is not perfect due is a sequel?
minus-squareSaltSong@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13arrow-down1·23 天前Not a sequel. Just because it’s not Portal 1. The fact that it’s second is not the problem. The problem is that the first one was flawless.
minus-squarethatKamGuy@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·23 天前So the gaming equivalent of ‘chasing the dragon’? That tracks!
minus-squareSaltSong@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·23 天前 chasing the dragon Huh. I guess it might be. Far from my first game, but my first perfect game. Yea, I guess that does track.
minus-squarenogooduser@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·22 天前In my opinion, Portal 2’s difficulty curve was off. It started in a good place and ended in a good place but was too easy for most of the game. The two player section was fantastic though.
Are you saying that Portal 2 is not perfect due is a sequel?
Not a sequel. Just because it’s not Portal 1. The fact that it’s second is not the problem. The problem is that the first one was flawless.
So the gaming equivalent of ‘chasing the dragon’? That tracks!
Huh. I guess it might be.
Far from my first game, but my first perfect game. Yea, I guess that does track.
Too few promises of cake
In my opinion, Portal 2’s difficulty curve was off. It started in a good place and ended in a good place but was too easy for most of the game.
The two player section was fantastic though.