I didn’t know reddit gave out the personal details of their users, but I guess I shouldn’t be surprised.

  • Fisch@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    Of course they can but what would be the point of that? It would just cost storage space.

    • Lodra@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      8 months ago

      An interesting discussion! You’re probably right about most Lemmy instances. But it’s entirely possible that some instances are running a modified version of Lemmy that collects more data. And only those admins will understand why. They could sell it as easily as any company.

      You need to trust your service providers or accept what they’re doing.

      • suppenloeffel@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        8 months ago

        Doesn’t even have to be malice. I’m sure that most instance admins are great, competent and caring, but setting up a Lemmy instance is trivial, securing it is not.

        The default configuration of a proxy could log connections, the config interface may accidentally be exposed unprotected and so on. Again, I’m not saying that most instances are inherently untrustworthy. But, depending on your instance, you are trusting one person or a small team of volunteers to stay on top of everything andyou can’t expect them to drain their bank accounts in case of legal issues for you.

        • Lodra@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Absolutely a good perspective on the surrounding infra! I fully agree. Thanks for sharing.

      • ___@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        CoW doesn’t mean your process won’t stop half way writing your movie file to disk if its improperly coded.