• Septimaeus@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    This is correct, especially at lower speeds. Greater fuel efficiency would come from lower wind and drivetrain resistance and use of a more efficient range of the motor’s powerband.

    Most vehicles are geared for optimal speed to fuel consumption around 55-65 mph (90-100 kph) not 70+ mph (110+ kph). So just going a bit under the speed limit can have a significant impact on fuel consumption.

    • pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Also, truckers drive efficiently, so just following what they do will save gas.

      But yeah, I don’t go over 65mph and I end up with 7-10mpg over my highway rating.

      • KISSmyOS@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I have no idea what mpg are exactly, but my car uses 5 liters for 100km when I drive it.
        The official rating is 7, and most car magazines at the time it was new claimed that it’s unrealistic cause it actually “needs” 8.

        When I went to the shop because my brake discs were rusty, the mechanic told me “yeah well you’re supposed to use them once in a while”.

        Edit:
        8 liters/100km = 29 mpg
        7 liters/100km = 34 mpg
        5 liters/100km = 47 mpg

        • pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 months ago

          Yeah, I got my last vehicle new, and went 165k miles (~265k Km) on the front brake pads. At every tire rotation I asked if I needed new ones, and for like 6 years they told me they were at 50% wear.

          I use throttle control to adjust my speed while driving, and coast as much as I can at redlights.