I have a number of Lemmy instances meant for discussion groups around specific topics. They are not being as used as I expected/hoped. I would like to set them up in a way that they can be owned by a consortium of different admins so that they are collectively owned. My only requirement: these instances should remain closed for registrations and used only to create communities.

  • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Ah, sorry if that wasn’t clear, the entire second half was theoretical about a better way of doing this.

    A type of federation where there is no “home” for a community any more. It exists equally on all servers, so any being removed would have ~0 effect.

    I mentioned that basically because I feel that’s a much better solution to the problem than shared ownership + locked registrations. Sorry if that wasn’t clear, not my primary language.

    • rglullis@communick.newsOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      A type of federation where there is no “home” for a community any more.

      This is not federation anymore, but an entirely different architecture. Nostr works like this, but it also has its flaws.

        • rglullis@communick.newsOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 hours ago
          • Your key is your identity. If it’s lost or stolen, you can not revoke it. That alone will make it virtually impossible to be used as an official application protocol for any organization.

          • Usability is even worse than anything on ActivityPub

          • Moderation is entirely punted to the end user.

          • (not technical, but relevant) it is completely dominated by Bitcoin maxis