• Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    10 hours ago

    All the new houses around here with no solar would indicate that is not true. They’re not even required to have a south facing roof.

    • dan@upvote.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      At least here in California, having solar panels on a non south facing roof usually only reduces production by 10-20%, as long as it’s not entirely north facing. Solar systems are often slightly undersized - it’s more cost effective to size it so it handles average load rather than the summer peaks you only see for a few weeks per year - so the actual difference for a given system may be less.

      With my system, I see the best output from south-east facing panels since they get the morning sun. West facing panels are also fairly popular here due to time-of-use electricity plans. Some electricity plans have peak pricing from 4 to 9 pm, so people want to try and collect as much sunlight as possible during that period before sunset.

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        The UK is a lot further north, and it’s probably not a massive loss.

        It was enough to prevent me getting “free” solar panels (while that was a thing) though, so I’m still salty about that.