• zephorah@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    3 days ago

    Free entertainment is a way to occupy and distract the festering masses. And yet they remain determined to scrub all capacity for such.

    If most people using free streaming could pay most would be already.

      • zephorah@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Climate change is still nebulous. It’s like population decline. Few will face the impact of it with anything practical or human until the negative impact personally stares them in the face.

        George Floyd protests and riots happened, in large part, because people were bored, unoccupied, and angsty about the world. Human behavior points rarely happen under the influence of a single variable.

        If anything, people are more fed up with their daily world, now, than at the time of Floyd. I think that’s a piece of why people kept reporting a sense of impending doom all year.

        Now we’ve hit a point where one guy with everything to lose said “enough” and went after a health care CEO. And we have plenty of people in this nation with nothing to lose. I wouldn’t be surprised if stage 4 cancer people started throwing themselves at CEOs.

        The wall of inactivity and learned helplessness has broken with Luigi.

        They’re not seeing how this scrubbing of entertainment access will impact the masses going forward? Plenty of people will steer away from action if you just give them free distraction.

        But here we are, instead, working hard to scrub all free distraction.

        • Collatz_problem [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Competition is won by those who extract profit now. Those who refrain from profiting even if they want to preserve the ability to profit in the future for whatever reason lose competition and are removed from making decisions. So only the most shortsighted capitalists remain.

    • datavoid@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      If most people using free streaming could pay most would be already.

      Surely this gets less true when every streaming service raises their price every 3 months, however.

      • zephorah@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        3 days ago

        I work 40hrs a week. No kids in the house. If I can’t stream, then what? Reading news and Reddit, probably. That’s probably the least healthy option.

        Subbing everything isn’t sustainable for working class. It kills the monthly with bug bites.

        • Ogmios@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          40
          ·
          3 days ago

          You could get a hobby. Maybe try to actually make something interesting out of your life instead of just consuming entertainment?

          • Sagittarii@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            23
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            You should get a hobby. Maybe try to actually make something interesting out of your life instead of just commenting on niche internet forums?

          • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            22
            ·
            3 days ago

            Yeah, how dare anyone want even a little mindless relaxation after being overworked in today’s hectic world.

          • zephorah@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            I have that, insomniac Lemmy ramblings aside. I’m making a point. There are many individuals out there without that capacity, financially or otherwise.

            Art supplies, sewing supplies, woodworking supplies, metalworking supplies, stained glass supplies, even gardening supplies, and all the tools that go with these activities, these are all things that have become quite expensive across the last decade. More so in the last 5 years. That’s the point. It’s not free.

            There’s a reason woodworking tools, art supplies, and sewing notions have been locked behind glass or mesh for a while now.

            Writing is free. That said, an industry complaint of the last decade is the number of prospective writers is, proportionally, too large compared to active readers of late. And many of those prospective writers don’t read books to feed their craft. I’m sure you’ve noticed the quality decline in fiction, minus a couple notable exceptions.

            The point is, what’s free for people to occupy themselves with?

            • Ogmios@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              I mean, before the Internet people spent a hell of a lot more time just hanging around with a small group of friends. You don’t need to buy expensive tools or reach a prospective audience to do anything like that. Boredom motivates people to find ways to entertain themselves, which has unfortunately been one of the largest casualties of online ‘life.’

              I’m not attempting to defend the system as they’re trying to build it, but rather to seek understanding of why they take these actions without imagining them as hateful, soulless people.

          • CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 days ago

            They just produced this interesting discussion that I consumed for entertainment. What about me?