OK, maybe you wouldn’t pay three grand for a Project DIGITS PC. But what about a $1,000 Blackwell PC from Acer, Asus, or Lenovo?


Besides, why not use native Linux as the primary operating system on this new chip family? Linux, after all, already runs on the Grace Blackwell Superchip. Windows doesn’t. It’s that simple.

Nowadays, Linux runs well with Nvidia chips. Recent benchmarks show that open-source Linux graphic drivers work with Nvidia GPUs as well as its proprietary drivers.

Even Linus Torvalds thinks Nvidia has gotten its open-source and Linux act together. In August 2023, Torvalds said, “Nvidia got much more involved in the kernel. Nvidia went from being on my list of companies who are not good to my list of companies who are doing really good work.”

  • Chemical Wonka@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    236
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Don’t forget those who made it happen. Nvidia was “forced” to integrate Linux into its ecosystem

    Nvidia has always been hostile to the Linux community or negligent to say the least

    1000043457

    • CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Nvidia was “forced” to integrate Linux into its ecosystem

      100% bullcrap.

      Nvidia’s servers for data processing have always run Linux. And you know what those servers run? It’s not Windows, that’s for sure. So why would they write multiple versions of a driver for the same hardware interface? Their servers use the same drivers that you would use for gaming on a Linux desktop system.

      In fact, no version of Windows is supported on their DGX servers, and AFAIK you can’t even install Windows on it (even if you managed, it wouldn’t be usable).

      Long story short, a vendor we were working with (about 6 or 7 years ago now), was working on their Linux version of their SDK. We wanted to do some preliminary testing on Nvidia’s new T4s that at this point were only available via Nvidia’s testing datacenter (which we had access to).

      During a call with some of the Nvidia engineers I had to ask the awkward question of “any chance there’s a Windows server we can test on?”. I knew it was a cringe question and I died a little during the 10 second silence until one of the Nvidia guys finally replied with “no one uses Windows for this stuff”. And he said it slowly like the reply to such a question needed to go slow to be understood, because who else would ask that question unless you’re slow in the head?

      Nvidia has always been hostile to the Linux community or negligent to say the least

      People say “hostile”, but I think a better word is arrogant. They wanted to force the industry to use their own implementations they owned or pioneered like egl-stream instead of open standards. But AMD and Intel have proven that open source graphics drivers not only work, but benefit from being open so that the community can scratch their own itches and fix issues faster.

    • mac@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Am I missing something here? Nvidia never caved to their demands IIRC

    • Cris@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      79
      ·
      1 day ago

      Man, I completely forgot about that. That’s honestly wild to think about in retrospect…

      • CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 hours ago

        It’s not. It had nothing to do with it. Nvidia was all in with Linux as soon as they realized their hardware could be used for data processing and AI. That realization was way more than a decade ago.

    • projectmoon@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 day ago

      Don’t know about “always.” In recent years, like the past 10 years, definitely. But I remember a time when Nvidia was the only reasonable recommendation for a graphics card on Linux, because Radeon was so bad. This was before Wayland, and probably even before AMD bought ATI. And it was certainly long before the amdgpu drivers existed.

      • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yeah it was before AMD did graphics.

        ATI had an atrocious closed source driver. I used it … but it was not good at much of anything.

        • endeavor@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          I had ati card on my pc when pentium 4 was all the rage. I literally spent my teenage years learning english in order to get the dumb games I saved up ages for to work without crashing constantly. Its shocking how the same terrible card manufacturer is part of the company that makes the only cpu worth damn and great gpus.

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Nvidia is still rather nice with FreeBSD, because their official proprietary driver there is, well, fully official, while drivers ported from Linux somewhat lag behind and have problems sometimes.