You asked why wait. The point of jail and fines is to avoid reoffending. The judge thinks he won’t, and will be more valuable to society as a doctor than an inmate. Also If he does this again then he will get hit twice as hard.
Something tells me that they are not publishing his name because they’re betting that his future patients would feel differently. I would not want to see Dr. Rapist for any reason, even if he’s the best physician in the city.
But Dr Shacked Up With A Woman Once When They Were Both Drunk And She Was Too Drunk And He Should Have Known Better might be a bit more acceptable to some.
In his summing up the judge said “It has been proven that sexual intercourse took place at a time that she was in a state that meant that she couldn’t possibly consent to it. The offence is serious and unacceptable.”
Not interested in debating this. It’s obvious that someone with much more experience and education in this field disagreed with you even though he stupidly decided not to punish the perpetrator.
You’re presuming a lot here. I’m just not interested in debate because I don’t care to convince you of what I believe or be convinced.
You don’t get a judgement against you if you aren’t a rapist, and I think rapists shouldn’t be doctors. I don’t want to waste my time talking in circles trying to make you see it from my view because you seem to think his eventual MD cancels out his rape of another person.
You asked why wait. The point of jail and fines is to avoid reoffending. The judge thinks he won’t, and will be more valuable to society as a doctor than an inmate. Also If he does this again then he will get hit twice as hard.
Something tells me that they are not publishing his name because they’re betting that his future patients would feel differently. I would not want to see Dr. Rapist for any reason, even if he’s the best physician in the city.
But Dr Shacked Up With A Woman Once When They Were Both Drunk And She Was Too Drunk And He Should Have Known Better might be a bit more acceptable to some.
Not interested in debating this. It’s obvious that someone with much more experience and education in this field disagreed with you even though he stupidly decided not to punish the perpetrator.
“He’s clever when he agrees with me, so you’re stupid, but stupid when he doesn’t.”
No. You’re not interested in debating this because you’ve jumped to conclusions and you’re neither reading nor thinking.
You’re presuming a lot here. I’m just not interested in debate because I don’t care to convince you of what I believe or be convinced.
You don’t get a judgement against you if you aren’t a rapist, and I think rapists shouldn’t be doctors. I don’t want to waste my time talking in circles trying to make you see it from my view because you seem to think his eventual MD cancels out his rape of another person.