pelespirit@sh.itjust.worksM to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 4 months agoWhoash.itjust.worksimagemessage-square38linkfedilinkarrow-up1340arrow-down129
arrow-up1311arrow-down1imageWhoash.itjust.workspelespirit@sh.itjust.worksM to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 4 months agomessage-square38linkfedilink
minus-squaresugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up3·4 months agoOnly if you use imperial units. The article uses tonnes, which is a unit of mass, not weight.
minus-squareHawke@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·4 months agoYes but I would interpret “heavy” to be a function of weight, not mass.
minus-squareFooBarrington@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·4 months agoSteel is heavier than feathers
Only if you use imperial units. The article uses tonnes, which is a unit of mass, not weight.
Yes but I would interpret “heavy” to be a function of weight, not mass.
Steel is heavier than feathers