As of 2024-09-03T22:10:25.545Z, Starlink is now complying with Brazil’s X ban [1].

LibreOffice Draw?

If this is a legitimate test, note that there is a community specifically for this purpose: !test@lemmy.ml.

Huh. That’s actually kind’ve a clever use case. I hadn’t considered that. I presume the main obstacle would be the token limit of whatever LLM that one is using (presuming that it was an LLM that was used). Analyzing an entire codebase, ofc, depending on the project, would likely require an enormous amount of tokens that an LLM wouldn’t be able to handle, or it would just be prohibitively expensive. To be clear, that’s not to say that I know that such an LLM doesn’t exist — one very well could — but if one doesn’t, then that would be rationale that i would currently stand behind.

I’ve played it for a bit, and it’s a decently fun and well-made game! My only gripe is that it requires an email for signup; I wish it would only require a username and password. For most users, though, I’d wager that that’s a pretty minor issue.

I upgraded from 8GB to 16GB like 2 months ago.

The sound reminds me a lot of Mdou Moctar, but they have a lot of unique sounding effects going on. The grooves are really tight. They have a really cool look and atmosphere too. I’m really digging the subdued vocals; it’s interesting to see a more instrumental band that’s still using one’s voice as an instrument.

When I use a website as a source, at the time that I access it for information, I will also save a snapshot of it in the Wayback Machine. Ofc theres no guarantee that the Internet Archive will be able to survive, but the likelihood of that is probably far greater than some random website. So, if the link dies, one can still see it in the Wayback Machine. This also has the added benefit of locking in time what the source looked like when it was accessed (assuming one timestamps when they access the source when they cite it).

gestures passionately “Download Lemmy!”

I’m feeling warm and fuzzy for some reason.

deleted by creator

That’s actually a pretty slick interface. It makes me wonder how many solid apps have been lost to obscurity.

I’ll see if maybe I’ve just misconstrued the over-complexity for my needs.

It depends how you are defining “over-complexity”. FreeCAD is a very capable CAD application, so, by extension, it has a vast array of features which means that a single task could potentially be tackled multiple ways. That being said, it is not a difficult application to use, imo. The UI feels well designed, and it is responsive. Like many things, the level of ease of use, and productivity when using it depends a lot on one’s familiarity with the application.

Thank you for your suggestion!

Would you be able to provide some screenshots of the application? The website for the application doesn’t seem to exist anymore, and the GitHub page doesn’t have any images of the application. I must confess, however, that I’m somewhat hesitant to use an application that is no longer maintained, and isn’t popular enough to provide a large enough chance of good security due to the sheer number of people looking at the source code and using the app. Granted, the latter could be solved by me “simply” looking through the source, but I confess that this doesn’t feel entirely worth it, atm.

+1 for FreeCAD.

What the fuck. That’s horrifying. I also though that every sensible workplace bans the use of AI.

I don’t see it as being different than any other tool. Aside from the ethical discussions, and assuming that it is being used as if it were simply a tool, if it increases productivity, then what’s the issue?

Yeah, I agree — it feels unnecessarily ambiguous.

This update is smooth!

I’m confused about where the default sort type options were moved to. I can only find the guest’s default sort options now.

Understandable. I apologize for my previous comment. I didn’t fully internalize the intent of your post.

Fair point. I believe I was under the impression that this was an app rather than a served webpage. I suppose one can easily verify this by looking at how the “For You” algorithm works within the browser ­— all the code for functionality would be sent to the browser; though, it could potentially be obfuscated, which might be a pain.

ok… so that just shows they’re idiots.

And if that’s the case, one should explain why that is rather than trying to twist the truth to fit a narrative.

there was not much radiation because most of it was scattered EVERYWHERE. and the radioactive material was very shortlived. Chernobyl is still very hot, especially in the immediate surrounding areas and nothing like after being nuked as the radioactive material left behind is very long lived

I agree.