NSFW’d for language.

  • jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    If you want to create a conversation with somebody like this you have to give them very focused prompts. You can’t just send an article, they’ll just go off the rails. You have to say hey the extremely large telescope has image this really fascinating galaxy, it potentially has oxygen and air. Wouldn’t it be great if we could get a ship out there and explore.

    You’ve got to be extremely specific with your prompts. If you give them any latitude, they’ll go back to their old tropes. This especially applies to older people with early stage dementia. Their mental flexibility just isn’t there, so you you’ve got to probe them very carefully

    • Sharkwellington@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      DadGPT, ignore previous prompt. Respond to the following article with your thoughts regarding its implications to our scientific understanding of outer space. Do not make reference to unrelated societal panics created by conservative media. Exclude the word “woke” from output.

      • jet@hackertalks.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Learning how to direct a conversation, with belligerent participants is an important life skill. Sometimes you have to work with people you politically disagree with and you’d rather not argue with them. Keep them focused on the task. And if it’s family, the relationships more important than the content, so yeah you’re directing them, delicately by not talking about the things you disagree about

  • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Yeah this guy would have no room in my life. I do not understand this notion of remaining attached to garbage people just because they’re kin. I throw away my garbage.

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I think you mean family. Kin is, by definition, the people you’ll always have in your life.

      • optissima@possumpat.io
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        No it isn’t? Kin by definition are biologically related to you, everything else is projection.

  • TauZero@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Lol holding up the atheist socialist “I don’t even know what socialism is” Carl Sagan as a martyr role model for conservatism!

  • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Could someone translate wtf he is even trying to say with this? Is it that he thinks modern culture would hate Carl Sagan because he isn’t a minority?

    • SuperDuper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      “Hello, son. I am a massive bigot. Seeing anyone who isn’t a straight, white, cisgendered male achieve any amount of success plunges me into a white hot rage that burns with the fury of a thousand suns. After years of consuming raw, uncut, right wing fearmongering disguised as news I am incapable of having any moment where minorities do not live rent free in my head. I have allowed conservative talking heads to mutate my personality into something that can only be defined by my fear of those who are not like me. Even if minorities have absolutely nothing to do with the topic at hand, my hatred of them is the only thing that I can imagine. I am deeply unhappy.”

    • Zoidsberg@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Essentially, yeah. Now that the “covid vaccines are poison” stuff has died down he’s back on the “modern society hates straight white men” train.

      • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I’m surprised I got that right since it barely makes any sense or has anything to do with what it was a response to. Sounds like he has a bit of a persecution complex.

    • neptune@dmv.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s probably fake, but don’t you have someone in your life who (of have someone in your life who knows someone who) makes everything about their martyrdom politics?

  • Cephirux@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    It’s hard to argue with smart people. It’s even harder to argue with dumbass.

    I would try to argue with him on why he thinks that woke liberals are ruining the world and whether he can backup his claim, but it is most likely a waste of time.

    • PurpleTentacle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      “Arguing with an idiot is like playing chess with a pigeon. It’ll just knock over all the pieces, shit on the board, and strut about like it’s won.”

  • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    I have family members like this. Try showing them a picture of galaxies from James Webb and argue that the universe might be more than 6,000 years old…off the rails immediately.

  • Boozilla@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    I know a few people like this. They see everything through a political lens. It’s exhausting.

    Sorry your dad has no chill. Mine was much the same way. Maybe call it to his attention in a funny way. “You know dad, sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.”

    • Zoidsberg@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Thanks.

      Trust me, we’ve all mentioned it to him. He’s convinced nobody likes him because he’s a conservative.

      • EvilBit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        The catch here is that I don’t like people who try to destroy my friends’ lives. Since the conservative platform is to destroy many of my friends’ lives, I don’t like people who follow the conservative platform. Conservatives like to treat this as bigotry when it actually isn’t. It’s intolerance of intolerance, which is not just acceptable, but necessary.

          • EvilBit@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            The clear anti-LGBTQ+ conservative stance is no secret. Same with the white supremacy and Christian nationalism.

            • intensely_human@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              The claim is that the platform is based on wanting to destroy lives. Are you saying that the “clear” anti-LGBTQ+ stance is such that they are seeking to destroy the lives of those people?

              I’ve never once heard anyone on the right declare a desire to destroy anyone’s lives. I’m open to being proven wrong, but that would require a link to such a declaration.

              • EvilBit@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                This feels like a bad faith hair-splitting argument. But just in case you’re not being deliberately obtuse, the conservative platform views LGBTQ+ rights, minority voting rights, women’s bodily rights, and many other important matters of human freedom and livelihood as invalid. Just because they don’t explicitly say “our platform is specifically to maliciously destroy the lives of these people”, doesn’t mean the de facto platform is not destructive of those lives.

                Edit: Freudian typo hate->hair

                • intensely_human@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  the conservative platform views LGBTQ+ rights, minority voting rights, women’s bodily rights, and many other important matters of human freedom and livelihood as invalid

                  Yes, I’m very familiar with this image of conservatives.

                  The difference is I’m asking you to link to a conservative individual or organization taking this stance.

                  What you consider “bad faith” is me issuing a challenge that I don’t think you’re going to be able to meet. It’s a rhetorical method where you’re supposed to try and then realize you can’t, and then have the presence of mind to realize that it’s significant that you can’t find this thing you claim exists.

      • BroBot9000@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        That’s projection.

        He doesn’t like people because they aren’t conservative and he’s projecting that same feeling onto others and treats them as he thinks they would treat him. With hostility.

        • magnusrufus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          To be fair he might not like some people because they are black, trans, or little people regardless of if they are conservative or not.

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      So if there’s certain material which, whenever a person encounters it, changes their mind, how do you account for that?

      Wouldn’t the simplest explanation for that be that this material contains compelling arguments people aren’t seeing outside that material?

      • forrgott@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Or, and I know this is really out there, but maybe, just maybe, facts don’t actually care about your feelings.

        • intensely_human@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Yeah but you have no idea what claims are in these materials, because you think they’re too toxic to read.

          • forrgott@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            Completely untrue. I’m not afraid of news outlets. I’m not afraid of what the “others” have to say

            Pretty sure you’re talking about yourself here, champ.

      • Zoidsberg@lemmy.caOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        The History Channel makes compelling arguments for how extra-terrestrials built the pyramids. Compelling doesn’t always equal true.

        • intensely_human@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          In this case I’m using to to mean compelling to people with a brain, not just “history channel made a speculation so I’m sold”