• teft@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    There seems to be an innate need for religion.

    For whom? Because I sure as shit don’t have any need to believe in fairy tales.

    • ByteWizard@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      For whom?

      Generally the uneducated or low-iq who simply can’t be educated. They don’t understand science so to them it might as well be another religion. In that case why not pick the religion that gives them a nice afterlife? Something they can fall back on and blame when they make poor decision after poor decision.

  • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    reminder that every time people complain about wokeness they’re literally just complaining about being conscious about systemic racism, because that’s what woke means.

    Just replace “woke” with “being a decent person” and it becomes pretty clear what these people want.

    • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      “Woke” started out as a simple acknowledgment that a person is conscious of the systemic oppression of various groups. Now the right wing has got its claws into the term it’s been effectively neutered. Now all it means is, “stuff that right wingers don’t like”

      It’s like “defund the police” which quickly became “abolish all policing”.

      It’s a useful strategy for them and it works to prevent honest discussion on how to solve societal problems by preventing people from having a shared understanding of the language needed for such discussion.

      • Uranium3006@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        “It’s like “defund the police” which quickly became “abolish all policing”.”

        It’s actually the other way around. The radical demand got watered down but it didn’t slow the fearmongeringbl even a little bit

      • AlternatePersonMan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Ugh, “defund the police” is a terrible phrase if you actually want the movement to succeed. I wish they would have gone with something along the lines of “police reform”. Immediately every conservative glommed onto “now they want to abolish all police!”

        We do need a massive overhaul to police. Unfortunately that means better marketing of the idea of it’s going to happen.

        • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          I could be wrong but “defund the police” was just a discussion point for activists talking amongst themselves. In that context it makes sense. What happened was that this inelegant phrase was seized as a weapon by the right and then every Dem politician had to answer if they supported the idea of abolishing the police.

          I’d imagine that many people would be receptive to the idea of taking some money out of police budgets so social workers and people trained in deescalation can be hired. For example cops aren’t a good fit when dealing with people facing mental health crises because they mostly turn to use of force and make a bad situation worse.

          If you twist this into, “are you in favor of abolishing all police?” then most people are going to say, “hell no, what a stupid idea, you moron”.

          Now any discussion about the rotten state of policing in the US had been effectively hobbled. Discussion is shut down. The right wing wins.

          • Fushuan [he/him]@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            What happened was that this inelegant phrase was seized as a weapon by the right

            I vividly remember tons of memes and posts on reddit, done in leftist grups by leftist people stating the sentence “defund the police”. The right did manipulate the meaning, but saying that they were the sole perpetrators of the popularity of the phrase is silly.

      • teft@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Same happened to the terms “political correctness” and “social justice”. The meaning gets twisted into something grotesque by think tanks and then it’s shipped out to talking heads so Billy-Bob can regurgitate it at the water cooler.

        • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          Critical Race Theory, school libraries full of porn, caravans of migrants heading to the southern border, activist judges legislating from the bench, and so on.

      • LazaroFilm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        I still have a hard time how “woke” is bad. Woke means your not asleep, it means you are not guided by others. How can people turn this into a bad thing. I’m proud to be woke.

        • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          Woke means that if you’re in a privileged position in a society, more equality is a threat to your status and should be suppressed.

    • Turkey_Titty_city@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Lots of ‘woke’ people are shitty people. I’ve had way too many experiences in the past few years with ‘woke’ people screaming at me about how I need to read more women authors or I’m a shitty awful human being. Or other equally absurd things, like I’m a bigot if I don’t ask you what your pronoun is. If you have a pronoun preference, how about you tell me? Just like you tell someone how to pronounce your name if it’s non-standard.

      I know lots of progressive people, and I am progressive. But I would never say I am ‘woke’. People who self-identify ‘woke’ tend to be mentally ill crazy people in my encounters, and use their politics as an excuse for abusive and hostile behavior just the way right-wing nazi nutbags do.

      Hell I even had a transwoman assault me verbally one day while I was just reading a book in a cafe. Comes up to me and demands that I give her my table because I’m a white cis guy and I should give up my ‘privileged’ to her. I told her to f off. My small business has been harassed by ‘woke’ activists who demand we give them money or they will say we are anti-black/lgbt+, etc. That’s not woke, that’s blackmail.

      Most ‘woke’ people I meet are basically 20 sometime trust-fund types who need a cause to give her their miserable lives purpose, because god knows they can’t get their shit together and do something positive with their lives. If they did maybe they’d stop being such awful abusive people who threaten and harass others.

      • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Hell I even had a transwoman assault me verbally one day while I was just reading a book in a cafe. Comes up to me and demands that I give her my table because I’m a white cis guy and I should give up my ‘privileged’ to her.

        I’m betting this never happened.

    • Throwaway@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Except woke people aren’t decent. Some woke people have good intentions, sure, but they aren’t decent. Being woke means being evil.

  • markr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Lumping ‘always’ with ‘sometimes’ is cooking your results to meet your objective.

  • Ranvier@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    If this graph isn’t just made up bs in the first place, one thought I recall from every major college campus I’ve been to is random religious preachers camped out every day telling everyone they’re evil, subhuman, and going to hell. Guessing the atheists find that a little more annoying and worthy of shouting back at than some of the religiously inclined.

    • XanXic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Nazi: “white power!” Normal people: “hey, stfu!” Cristian Conservatives: “hey I don’t agree with it but let’s hear him out. Some people might agree, his ideas deserve to be discussed and given a platform”

      • III@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Alternatively:

        Reasoned person: “We should help poor people”

        Christian Conservatives: “STFU you woke liberal piece of shit, I hope you die! Go suck Biden’s dick, loser”

  • bradorsomething@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Study is done by “TheFire.org,” which is described as a competitor to the ACLU.

    I know… why do we need a competitor to the ACLU?

    Well, per Wikipedia: “FIRE has been described as a competitor of the ACLU. In 2021, the organization had an annual revenue of $16.1 million. FIRE has received major funding from groups which primarily support conservative and libertarian causes, including the Bradley Foundation, Sarah Scaife Foundation, and the Charles Koch Institute.”

    Oh Charles Koch, you scoundrel.

  • Izzy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    What does it mean to “Shout down a speaker”? What are they speaking about and what is the purpose of shouting at them?

    • ninjan@lemmy.mildgrim.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      These open questions are always kinda crap to draw conclusions from because we don’t know how the question was interpreted by the people answering. In this case we also don’t know the sample size of the groups. Could also be a multitude of other variables at play like location because there are few places where you can find all these religions while getting a good sample size and controlling for other variables like income, education, age etc.

    • tburkhol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      And does it apply only to verbal, podium speech, or also to written books and speech by people in [drag] costume.

  • Zeth0s@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Non-American here. What is Christian and why Catholic, protestant, and orthodox Christians are not Christians?

    This doesn’t make much sense