• MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          Ya done good! The change in sheer size from A to D can be hard to grasp. I remember getting a model set as a teen with Enterprise TOS, A, and D, and was taken aback at how small the other two were. Crazy stuff.

          • CptEnder@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            9 months ago

            The Constitution Class (NCC-1701A/B) were effectively light cruisers by the TNG era whereas the Galaxy Class was a super-heavy explorer cruiser. The main difference between them was the NCC-1701 was designed to operate for 5 years without service but the NCC-1701D could theoretically run indefinitely on its own without major battle damage. Large part of its mass is form the power systems needed to run its own industrial fabricators (replicators) and the experimental research hardware. That and all the families living aboard.

          • FauxPseudo @lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            9 months ago

            I was all “wait? What? It’s more than twice the size?” And then trying to find the right way to show it. I even looked at other pictures of the cargo ship but none were right for the comparison. One of my failed drafts.

    • VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      9 months ago

      Seriously, the E-D is huge to the point where the amount of time it would take to get anywhere on the ship would make it impractical. The E-A is roughly the size of its nacelle.

      • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        That was the point of the Galaxy-class of course. It was meant to be less “rough and tumble sailors” and more “long term cohesive floating city that could technically be self-sufficient for 10-20 years and show the technical prowess of the Federation” . Had to be big to support the 1000 crew compliment.

        • VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          9 months ago

          Except everyone IRL forgot that and now it’s an average size ship. Also, a ship that size could easily support several thousand people, not just one thousand. Modern aircraft carriers have thousands of people on them and their volume is comparable to the E-A.

          • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            9 months ago

            Modern aircraft carriers have thousands of people on them and their volume is comparable to the E-A.

            they also don’t need to run completely self-contained life support systems that must generate and maintain water and breathable air rather than pulling it from conveniently free (or near-free) sources right outside the ship

            The energy requirements for warp travel are also many orders of magnitude higher than pushing a carrier through water so the space dedicated to warp cores and other energy management/propulsion systems must also be greater