• godot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Give me a perception check.”

    “Fourteen total.”

    “You don’t notice anything different .”

    “I get out my shovel.”

    • ono@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      DM quietly raises encounter difficulty in response to metagaming

        • MimicJar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          It depends on your table, but I disagree.

          If I ask the party for a perception check and they all fail the party should be aware of their choices (in this case, perception is important). If I then surprise them with an enemy they are clear why that happened.

          Alternatively in this case it’s to locate something, maybe they want to spend a luck point, flash of genius, or other similar ability.

        • nocturne213@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Sometimes I ask for perception checks when there is nothing to notice out of the ordinary just to see them squirm.

    • Thrashy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      One of the reasons why, as a DM, I like the Passive Perception mechanic in 5e. It takes some of the thrill of a roll away from the players, but it gives me the tools to resolve these sorts of situations without tempting the players to metagame.

  • Hillock@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    You can also summon scratch and he will find it for you. Apparently he even finds chests that don’t have a visible survival check. But I can’t confirm that because I never have him summoned.