• Emotet@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    I have an understanding of the underlying concepts. I’m mostly interested in the war driving. War driving, at least in my understanding, implies that someone, a state agency in this case, physically went to the very specific location of the suspect, penetrated their (wireless) network and therefore executed a successful traffic correlation attack.

    I’m interested in how they got their suspects narrowed down that drastically in the first place. Traffic correlation attacks, at least in my experience, usually happen in a WAN context, not LAN, for example with the help of ISPs.

    • barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’m interested in how they got their suspects narrowed down that drastically in the first place.

      They listened in on the chat he was in and could glean from chatter that he lived in a particular municipality or something, rough area. Stuff like, dunno, complain that the supermarket is closed because they had a water leak or something and pin-pointing that. The rest was driving around and see if anything correlates roughly, then park there long enough to make that correlation court-proof.