• Vik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    10 months ago

    A new start in dGPU is no easy task, but I honestly thought Arc’s relative RTRT and compute perf were quite good?

    My main complaint would be their Linux support situation for Arc. I’m hoping it will improve over time.

    • Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I do not count Arc as decidedly a failure (yet), allegedly the cards are pretty good with the new drivers. It was previous attempts of making cards that supposedly could run pure raytracing, that were supposed to compete with Nvidia in datacenters. But to be fair, 5 years of fumbling is some years ago, I was talking more 5 to 10 years back, where it appeared Intel failed with just about everything.

      But Itanium their new server 64 bit CPU is way longer ago, and so is the GPU I think it was Knights Ferry, complete failure with twice the energy consumption and half the performance of Nvidia. Only later production began to fail too, and Intel Core2 was shortly beat by Ryzen on all parameters, and of course Optane failed too.

      • hips_and_nips@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        Itanium

        Now there’s a name I haven’t heard in a long time.

        And the Xeon Phi (Knight’s Ferry/Landing) was in the GPU space, but only in GPGPU. The idea was that the Xeon Phi, with an x86-compatible core, could, with less modification, run software that was originally targeted to a standard x86 CPU. Something like 68-70 x86-64 cores.

        I had a couple of them when I was taking parallel programming back in the day. Nifty little devices, but largely outshined by distributed multiprocessing for x86-64 and paled in comparison to the power of CUDA. That might be my own bias talking though.

        • Buffalox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          paled in comparison to the power of CUDA. That might be my own bias talking though.

          I don’t have personal experience, but AFAIK that’s what everybody says. They were marketed as compute units, but their compute performance was very poor compared to the competition.