Last night Organic Maps was removed from the Play Store without any warnings or additional details due to “not meeting the requirements for the Family Program”. Compared to Google Maps and other maps apps rated for 3+ age, there are no ads or in-app purchases in Organic Maps. We have asked for an appeal.

As a temporary workaround for the Google Play issue, you can install the new upcoming Google Play update from this link: https://cdn.organicmaps.app/apk/OrganicMaps-24081605-GooglePlay.apk

The Announcement on various Networks: Fosstodon Post
Twitter Post
Telegram Post

If you don’t know what Organic Maps is, it is an alternative to OsmAnd and google maps, more info on the official site (link) and GitHub.

Maybe an error? Honestly this is a weird one. I hope we will learn more in the coming hours.

You can still get it on the other channels, like F-Droid or Obtainium. Still, we all know that not being on the Play Store is an heavy sentence for any Android app.

EDITs
  • Added F-Droid link.
  • Fixed Typo in the obtainium link.
    • odium@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      70
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s built on open street maps and is great for trail stuff: hiking, dirt biking, horse riding, etc.

      • Hannes@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        4 months ago

        Was using Osmand before and it’s a lot nicer to use for day to day navigation on the bike than the sluggy mess Osmand sometimes is

      • IrritableOcelot@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Does anyone know why the only public transport option is “subway”? I don’t get why they would only index subways.

          • noodlejetski@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            4 months ago

            because you need to pull the schedules for each country in order to do that. they’re working on public transport navigation, but it’s still not ready for use.

            • Norah - She/They@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              If it’s not ready for use, it either shouldn’t show up by default, or it should have a visible disclaimer. Otherwise it could be dangerous…

              • noodlejetski@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                yes, that’s exactly why public transport other than the subway doesn’t show up by default and you have to go an extra mile in order to enable it.

                • Norah - She/They@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  the subway showing up without the rest is beta software compared to other choices. It might route you three tomes as far all because it doesn’t know buses exist.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’d first heard of it yesterday when I saw it recommended here somewhere.

      However, I wouldn’t assume maliciousness over incompetence. It is Google after all… Anybody who has ever published anything on there has probably had it removed at some point. There’s so many malicious apps and spurious reports, it could honestly be anything. The smaller your app, the longer it takes for an actual human to get involved and sort it out.

    • Blizzard@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      4 months ago

      They’ve just convinced me to try it. It looks surprisingly good. I’d only wish there was a satellite layer. Or is there a way to download it?

      • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        4 months ago

        Nope, its desgined for offline use, which is just not compatible with huge image files. I dont know what source they would use for sat images, but that would probably complicate things a lot either way. Also if you load sat image tiles from a webserver, then that server/provider will also always know your location.

        • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 months ago

          OsmAnd (another OSM-based app) allows you to set underlay maps from external sources which will be downloaded from those external sources as needed. I do not know if Organic Maps has this feature too but it can clearly be done.

        • LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Just tried it. Compared to OsmAnd it’s very easy to use.
          But only seems to have vector and offline maps.

        • Blizzard@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Storage space is not an issue for me and it wouldn’t be for others if this was optional. I guess the only problem is, as you say, where to get satellite images for an app that doesn’t make money.

          • Alex@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            4 months ago

            I think you underestimate how much storage those tiles take up compared to the vector map data.

  • N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    4 months ago

    Google should really think about being nicer to competitors right now. Yet another reason it needs to be broken up by Lina Khan and the FTC.

      • Unbecredible@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Chair Khan? Am I the only one that things it’s a bad look to have that evil tiger from The Jungle Book leading the FTC?

          • Catsrules@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            28
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Isn’t that what side loading is?

            My definition of side loading is installing anything outside of an app management system. For example going to a website and downloading the APK and installing it.

        • Norah - She/They@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          4 months ago

          The only way to get it outside of sideloading is flashing a custom ROM like LineageOS that includes it. It’s not exactly available in the play store.

          • Yer Ma@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            What in the world are you all calling “side loading” you just download the APK and install it. No cables, no ADB, no side loading

            Edit, I guess kids these days are calling downloading APKs side loading lol

            • odelik@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              17
              ·
              4 months ago

              ITT: Witnessing somebody learning what sideloading is and isn’t as technical as they think it is.

                • odelik@lemmy.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  It isn’t? I’ve been using the term since I picked up my first Android phone in 2010 and there were side-loaded apps everywhere. Hell, you used to have to side-load the Amazon Store app. And that was all just “download this apk and install it” Workflows.

              • caseyweederman@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                4 months ago

                Sideload, to me, means pushing it onto the phone and installing it from a second, local device. Loaded from the side. Easy enough to do if you have the tools.

                Downloading an APK through a browser and installing it from a file browser, all from the single device itself, wouldn’t count as sideloading given my personal definition of the term.

                • You’re mixing the definitions of sideloading media and sideloading apps. Sideloading media follows your definition, e.g. transfer via another local device. Sideloading apps refers to the installing of apps outside of the (pre-)installed app store, e.g. by installing an APK directly.

                • Norah - She/They@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  That’s fine, your definition just doesn’t seem to be the norm. I think as things have changed over time, and it’s possible and easy to do it all on the device, that the definition has shifted. To me it means installing applications from outside of official channels.

            • Catsrules@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              4 months ago

              That is what they are saying.

              They are just pointing out the exception. The only way you wouldn’t need to sideload F-Droid is if it happened to be pre-installed on the OS itself.

              • Yer Ma@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                4 months ago

                I guess while I was sleeping side loading meaning went from having to manually move an APK from another device to an android via adb to just anything you downloaded?

                That’s silly, but okay

          • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            Wait, since when does LineageOS include F-Droid? I remember having to download it myself using the built-in browser the last time I tried it.

      • G14D0S@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        4 months ago

        You can’t download it from the Google Play store. You’ll have to download the .APK (application package, the installation file format for all Apps) from this url, there should be a tutorial to guide you further:

        https://f-droid.org/

      • noodlejetski@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        https://f-droid.org/en/

        there are other apps than can access F-droid and everyone will soon start replying saying why they think their choice is the only reasonable one and everything else is the worst thing ever, but the official one under that link should be enough to get you started.

  • CaptObvious@literature.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    4 months ago

    Seems to be still available on Apple’s store. And if Google intended to bury it, this is definitely Streisand Effect at work. Wish I’d known about this a few years ago when I was hiking more

  • Moonrise2473@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’m really curious about what kind of BS. Like you could search a sexy shop and have directions to go in person?

  • gencha@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    4 months ago

    Why would you enlist a map app under the Families program in the first place though?

    • petrescatraian@libranet.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      4 months ago

      @gencha No reason at all. It was probably wrongfully flagged by Google’s AI based on some stupid wrongful training data. At least that’s what I think though, because folks at Pushbullet (remember the app?) seem to be having similar problems about “not mentioning that they upload user data to their servers” even though they clearly mention this when the app is opened for the first time.

      blog.pushbullet.com/2022/10/27…

      @Mechanize

      • gencha@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        That makes sense, but my understanding is, what Google considers Family content is not an add-on to regular content. Your content is not also for children, it is catered towards them. This implies using dedicated Google functionality, special SDKs, and so on, to comply with law. So your product needs to be designed in a very specific way to be eligible. I’m not aware of how Google Play restricts children from installing certain apps, but you can always install an app through a parental supervisor account.

        To me, this story seems like a lot of crying over a situation that is not fully explained.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    4 months ago

    This totally is accidental and coincidental and has nothing to do with Google being a dick, as per usual.

    So sad to see google now being the same shit as Microsoft

  • NaoPb@eviltoast.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I did not know of this app but you know I’m gonna install it now.

    Thanks Google!

  • monobot@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    4 months ago

    Maybe an error?

    Error would be if they removed GMaps or Gmail from Play store, this is sabotage.

    Play store is 99% some kind of scum, but they found open source app that community likes and is providing service comparable to their app. Yeah, right.

    If they don’t want us to call it sabotage, they should be extra careful about apps that are providing same service as them.