• wewbull@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    I do wonder, given it was “antisemitism” that finally sunk Corbyn, how he’d do now. Critising Israel is no longer a problem. Infact large segments of society are calling for a far more critical stance on Israel and its actions.

    • anytimesoon@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      It would have just been something else. Antisemitism is just the one that stuck, but if that hadn’t worked they would have kept trying to put people off one way or another.

      As much as Corbin had decent ideas, his handling of the press was abysmal

      • RobotToaster@mander.xyzOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        To me, Corbyn’s problem was being too nice. When the party needed an old fashioned Stalinist purge of Blairites he made the arch Blairite his Brexit secretary.

        When Blair purged socialists from the party he rejected calls for Corbyn to be expelled, because he didn’t consider him a threat, you should always learn from your opponents’ mistakes.

    • steeznson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      He had quite a lot of problems. Most seemed to stem from the way that he seemingly seemed to side against the West in any international dispute, which is suboptimal in a prime ministerial candidate. Those views also led to him sharing platforms with some questionable people.

      • 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yeah and in a similar vein he’s a huge contrarian in a huge number of areas - it seems like if he didn’t have a strong opinion on something he just went against the status quo on it regardless of how illogical that was, which in my opinion at least is a pretty poor trait for someone who literally has control over the status quo