• Tailz (she/her)@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    This is me but with Shawshank Redemption. I get what it was trying to go for but I just didn’t vibe with it. I can appreciate the fact that so many people saw something in it that I didn’t. To me it was decent but by no means one of the best films ever

  • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 days ago

    When you find mediocrity unacceptable, popular shit doesn’t usually suit your palate. This isn’t a bug, it’s a feature.

  • thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    I find it helps to avoid the hype trains surrounding new media releases, as well as anything after the teaser trailer.

    Getting one’s expectations up usually results in the said media failing to live up.

    Best to go in blind and make your own mind up afterwards!

  • Squizzy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    I have never tried so hard to like an artist as Frank Ocean. He isnt for me, other than his Earl festures and when Three Stacks did a quick track on Blonde.

    Its no disrespect, its me thats the problem

  • Paranomaly@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    I try to avoid a lot of discourse around movies/books I haven’t seen yet as the expectation can ruin it for me. That said, Infinity War and Ready Player One (the book) still get me angry thinking back on them and the hype didn’t help. (Public opinion seems to have flipped largely on the latter, but there was a point when it was held up)

  • pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    for me it’s more anger, like “why the fuck did i even waste my time on this and what’s wrong with all these people”

    i wish breaking bad was a movie because at least the only time I wasted would’ve been around 2 hours. bring your fucking downvotes i don’t care if you don’t mind pointless plot points that keep going nowhere, and repeatedly underlined things are either dropped unceremoniously, or meet very unsatisfying and unbelievable ends. breaking bad was badly written and entirely carried by its phenomenal actors.

  • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    9 days ago

    if i lived life thinking there was something wrong with me just because i don’t like something it seems like everyone else likes, then that would be one miserable existence–no thanks. anyway, for me it was the big lebowski–probably the most boring pointless movie i ever sat through

    • Ricky Rigatoni@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      8 days ago

      The one saving grace of lebowski is that when you bring up not liking it the people who do like it are too busy quoting it to argue with you.

      • Empricorn@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 days ago

        Everything’s a fucking travesty with you, man! And what was all that shit about Vietnam? What the fuck has anything got to do with Vietnam? What the fuck are you talking about!?

    • nailingjello@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      Thank you. Plus his “best friend” (John Goodman) was a complete dick that did nothing of benefit for him the entire movie.

      Haven’t watched it in years though, so I was planning to re-watch and see if my opinion changes.

  • Meltdown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    Any of those boring-ass superhero movies. What is so appealing about hour-long GCI fight scenes and no plot?

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      I think they just forgot the lessons from the earlier movies. They had action but there was a lot of build up so it meant something.

      Now you’re just straight into a boring fight scene with no stakes. And somehow the bigger the stakes the less there are because you know they can’t fail.

      And now even the rare consequences can be undone through time travel and multiverse bullshit.

      • Comment105@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 days ago

        That’s the whole thing with Infinity War, they failed hard and that made it a wild story.

        • Blackmist@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          8 days ago

          I think they fucked up having Endgame the year after infinity War. Should have left it five years or so, and had things happening in between. I feel we missed out on a gritty R-rated, Punisher style, Hawkeye there. It should have had consequences that were left to feel for a bit, rather than instantly going “magic bullshit go” and reversing it all.

          But they fucked that by having Spidey get dusted, so they had to bring it back quick otherwise how would they explain how Tom Holland had gone from looking about 14 to being a man.

          • Comment105@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            8 days ago

            I do agree we missed a bit of ronin Hawkeye action, and such. They don’t really have an interest in comitting to going that dark.

    • Jimmycakes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      8 days ago

      The colors! it’s so many. Plus there is a plot it’s just not very deep like in a comic book. The whole source material like 20 pages. It’s not novels.

      • DacoTaco@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        This is very true, but id like to point out its a us comic thing. I’d invite you to read european comics, belgian ones in specific.
        The thorgal series, aria, joko tsuno, or hell even the suske & wiske reboot called amoras. They are teen/adult comics that are a lot darker and more flushed out story wise than us hero comics

        • Jimmycakes@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 days ago

          I will check those out thank you. We have some more advanced ones here as well they just don’t seem to make movies about it unfortunately.

          • DacoTaco@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 days ago

            Thats sad because some real adult/darker themed comics that dont follow the superhero theme are real gems. Got some us recommendations?

    • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      Never forget the golden rule: DC;RtRR, or

      Disregard capeshit; rewatch The Raid Redemption

    • thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      i don’t think I’ve ever seen a rabbid Fandom around it.

      it was just an easy approachable pretty movie for the masses. with a massive budget and a very well known director it brought people in to see the best visuals hollywood sfx had at the time. that’s basically how it was marketed, as a tech demo.

      I’ve never once seen anyone fanboy about it. it sold well, but didn’t excite many.

      on three other hand, avatar the last air bender has a massive and rabid fandom.

      • SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        9 days ago

        don’t think I’ve ever seen a rabbid Fandom around it.

        were you around when the movie was just released?

        There was an insane weird fandom around it. From people just loving it to full on navi otherkin-ing. People getting depressed and suicidal to not live in that world. And I’m not talking about a handfull of people but quite a large group.

        • thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          i was around then, I’ve just never met anyone who cared about that movie.

          if there were clips going around of people dressing up like that I’d chalk that up to being a marketing campaign.

        • Something Burger 🍔@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 days ago

          It’s the second highest grossing movie of all time, yet no one who has watched it can quote a single line from it, or recall the name of any character.

          • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 days ago

            Avatar: The Way of Water is 3rd highest grossing (Ignoring inflation) so it’s not just the 3D part.

            And people cosplay it frequently.

            I really don’t get it.

          • samus12345@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            8 days ago

            Huh, I certainly can’t. The only name that I can recall is “unobtanium” because it’s so stupid. “Big dumb movie that has good visuals” has always been my estimation of it.

        • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 days ago

          It was a pretty awesome experience to see in theaters at the time. The story was ass even then but the affects were amazing enough to carry it. My GF at the time and I went back twice to see it. Watching it on a regular screen these days it’s completely forgettable.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 days ago

      It’s very true that “it was just Dances With Wolves in space,” but Dances With Wolves is a good story. A good story + decent directing + pretty visuals = a movie that’s at least decent, if not mind-blowing or whatever.

      Avatar 2, on the other hand, definitely suffered story-wise.

    • Stamets@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      9 days ago

      I can see not liking that movie. It’s very specific. Endearing for a shitload of people, myself included, but it’s a very particular brand of comedy.

      Movie? Oh god there are so fucking many. One that comes to mind at the moment is Whiplash. Ive seen it 3 times because a dude I cared about deeply loved it. Everytime I saw it I got it less and less. I don’t see why people like it at all.

      • Ech@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 days ago

        Oh man. I think Whiplash is amazing and the story absolutely sickens me at the same time. I can absolutely understand people not liking it.

        • Stamets@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 days ago

          I wasn’t sickened or anything. I was just bored. Just felt overly pretentious to me which, considering the Juliard or whatever school stuff, I figured was the point.

    • EfreetSK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 days ago

      I second The princess bride but to add something new: (although not a movie but a serie)

      The Game of Thrones

      I love fantasy, I love medieval history, I love huge worlds, I love slow pace. But this one … just didn’t click, I don’t even know why. I gave up after the 4th episode

      • Leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        I know why - Martin can’t write complex characters and confuses shock value for motivations. They’re all caricatures, not characters. Its just a medieval soap opera.

        • EfreetSK@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          medieval soap opera

          This sounds accurate when I think about it, maybe I found out why I wasn’t interested. The thing is - I don’t mind medieval soap operas (to some degree), I really liked The White Queen, The White Princess and The Spanish Princess. But those are based on real characters in actual history, I can forgive them for being boring at times since history is sometimes a bit boring. But for me the selling point and the excitement comes from the fact that this actually happened (well … sort of). With GoT it felt like I’m watching one of those medieval soap operas but without the excitement of being based on the real thing

      • runner_g@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 days ago

        I tried the show twice and never made it to the second episode. Everyone who knows me is blown away by the fact that “I’ve never watched GoT” because I’m such a big fantasy nerd. I’ve even tried the audiobooks but made it maybe 2 chapters in.

      • 1ostA5tro6yne@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        i was invited to a viewing party for a GoT season premier. i had never seen any of the show before and had no idea what i was in for beyond “gritty fantasy show”. they all talked it way up, told me it was “sex and violence the TV show” and how much i would love it.

        it was so so so boring i thought it would never end. i’m baffled why it’s popular.

      • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        I just got annoyed that every character I liked died. Real life is depressing enough without watching fiction that also just bums you out.

      • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        See if you can find “Black Sails” It’s got all the sex and violence and intrigue GOT promised in a much more fast paced form.

    • aeronmelon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 days ago

      I once knew someone who told me she couldn’t enjoy the movie because the ships traveled somewhere that was anachronistic to the time period.

      Like, what??

      • blitzen@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 days ago

        Like the overall premise of the post asks, it just didn’t click. For people who love it, I don’t think they’re wrong. I generally like the humor, and the cast is great– like legitimately great. But it might be the medieval setting that I seldom find interesting, or the magical/mystical things that I never do.

        • DreamButt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          I mean the setting isn’t really the point. It’s about the characters and their journey. So it sounds like you liked the parts that most people like

    • Ibaudia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 days ago

      What?? That movie has everything, it’s like the perfect movie. This is the only answer that has left me genuinely confused.

      • exasperation@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        This whole thread is kinda wild to me, but I think this Princess Bride answer helps me distill it down to: I’m ok with you not liking movies that I love, but how can you say that you don’t understand other people liking it?

        I don’t care for Star Wars or Lord of the Rings but never has it crossed my mind that this is more than just a matter of taste, that there are people whose preferences are outright wrong.

    • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      The Princess Bride is an action movie that many people don’t realise is an action movie, I love it.

    • fibojoly@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      Oh, there is my bus. Thanks to the Net I know all the characters and quotes. But I guess Mel Brooksthat movie’s humor never really did it for me, sorry.

      (edit : apologies. I always thought it one one of his)

  • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 days ago

    [off topic?]

    I had heard about Gone with The Wind all my life and I knew it was incredibly racist. It finally came on basic cable and I decided to see what all the fuss was about.

    I found myself watching and liking a movie I knew was complete and utter bullshit.

    • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      9 days ago

      Well, as a movie, it’s a good movie. Great directing, incredible acting (for the era), with a dynamic and well paced story. It holds up in technical terms despite the shifts in style and performance that have happened over the years.

      If you hum really hard during the racist parts, you could still call it one of the greats. And it isn’t like it’s “birth of a nation” bad in that regard. There’s way worse movies out there from the era, and the era before that was horrible on average.

      • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        [nsfw]

        Watch an Peter O’Toole movie, ‘The Stunt Man.’ Great movie; funny, scary, exciting, romantic, plus a bunch of great plot twists.

        There’s a scene where a kinda schubby screen writer talks about how he paid $1,000.00 to fly to Guatemala to have sex with a 14 year old virgin.

        That line was considered only mildly off-color when the movie came out.

            • Jiggle_Physics@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              9 days ago

              Also, Sean Connery was open about about beating women. He saw nothing wrong with it if he felt it was “corrective” of behavior, like a dog.

            • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              8 days ago

              So part of the reason for the toys is actually a bit of interesting cultural shifting. Basically back then there wasn’t really a separation between adult and kids media unless it was explicitly pornography, so a lot of things we see now as for kids or for adults still had broad appeal in mind.

              This shifted through the 60s, 70s, and then solidified some time in the 80s. It’s why Star wars a New Hope has dismemberment while being rated PG, same thing with Indiana Jones.

              • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                8 days ago

                You can also see this when watching films from the 50s and 60s as they were really designed to cover a variety of genres at once. Has a little romance sub-plot for mom, action sequences for little Tommy and some cool cars/gadgets for dad. Y’know because everything had to be stereotyped to hell and back. But it is jarring seeing how much of variety films old movies really were

                • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  8 days ago

                  While the reasoning for why that is the case is kinda meh, I wish that was done more often nowadays. Sadly it seems like the media that inherited that tendency was video games, which while I love my vidya it does make it harder to backwards push it into film.

              • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 days ago

                As a side note. The MPAA ratings system came out in 1968. Any movie made before that was automatically “G” rated if it had been shown in theaters. So if you showed “Goldfinger” in a theater it would be “G.” But movies get rated differently if it’s VHS/DVD; so when the movie went on sale it was PG, then PG-13.

  • k0e3@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    I thought Black Panther was mid at best but it made me sound like a racist whenever I mentioned that.

    • Something Burger 🍔@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      Ironically, this movie is pretty racist. The opening scene is a cliche basketball scene, and Wakanda, despite being a futuristic society, still uses tribal law and decides its leaders by fighting half naked to the death.

      • Jhuskindle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        8 days ago

        I mean I’m confident they were to fight have naked due to eye candy. That 100% worked on me despite the bland writing.

      • dmention7@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 days ago

        Aquaman

        I agree with you in general, but I don’t think you can pin this one on the dudes… or at least not the ones below 3 on the Kinsey scale 😆

  • MehBlah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    Any of the mission impossible/fast and furious films. That shit is boring.